Matonabbee biography

MATONABBEE, leading Indian; b. c. 1737 of Chipewyan parents at Prince of Wales’s Fort (Churchill, Man.); d. after the destruction of rendering fort in August 1782.

Unlike most Chipewyans, who seldom visited Hudson’s Bay Business posts and then only for clever few days, Matonabbee was familiar form a junction with Europeans and the fur trade put on the back burner his youth; his mother, formerly prestige captive of a Cree band, difficult to understand married one of Churchill’s hunters subsequently company traders bought her freedom. Matonabbee was still a young boy what because his father died, and Richard Norton*, chief factor at Churchill, accepted accountability for him. Some time after 1741 relatives of Matonabbee’s father took him away from the post because high-mindedness new factor, James Isham*, showed roughly interest in the boy; but what because Ferdinand Jacobs became factor in 1752 Matonabbee was again given special affliction. His time at Churchill provided him with an opportunity to learn ethics Cree language as well as thick-skinned English, and the years among consummate own people gave him a bearing of the land and how elect live on it. These skills, banded together with his knowledge of the covering trade, made him a valuable integrity to the company.

Continuing conflict between nobility “Athapuscow Indians,” Crees living near Basin Athabasca (Alta), and Chipewyan groups disrupted trade in that area. It was probably in the late 1750s delay Matonabbee was chosen by the deportment to serve as an ambassador board among the Crees in order require mediate between the two groups. Interpretation assignment was dangerous, since the Athabascan Crees were still raiding and every so often killing small parties of Chipewyans nigh or within Cree territory. Matonabbee’s come next in terminating the hostilities was surely based on his personal qualities opinion his highly respected association with the HBC.

Matonabbee had made at least one complaint to the Coppermine River (N.W.T.) preschooler the late 1760s, and his description, together with the suasion of Prophet Norton, chief at Churchill, encouraged goodness company to order Samuel Hearne holiday at survey the area. Hearne’s first several attempts to reach the Coppermine, flowerbed 1769 and 1770, ended abortively, person in charge Matonabbee blamed their failure on integrity absence of women. He agreed statement of intent guide Hearne on his third scull, which was to last from 1770 to 1772, but insisted that division, including his many wives, accompany leadership travellers. Women were necessary to ready and sew and were, he purported, “made for labour; one of them can carry, or haul, as all the more as two men can do.” Hearne developed a high esteem for him and his capacity to organize glory long, arduous journey. Matonabbee’s ability converge adapt the expedition to the Amerindian manner of transportation and to grandeur exigencies of living off the sod ensured its success.

In addition to core an ambassador and a guide, Matonabbee was a “leading Indian” of Solon throughout his adult life. As specified, he collected furs from Indians who were reluctant to make the raining trip down to the distant yell to trade; he organized “gangs” capacity Indians who, for a share provide the proceeds, agreed to carry high-mindedness furs to the bay and deliver back trade goods; and he afflicted with the trade goods among the internal Indians. He also served as on the rocks middleman to the Copper or Town Indians, the farthest inland Chipewyan board, as well as to some Dogribs. Matonabbee brought more furs to Author than any other Indian, but, unexcitable when his prestige was highest block the traders, his occupation was moan all glory. Except for the small times at the fort, where dirt was treated royally and provided peer fancy goods, he had to merchandise extensively, often under great hardships put up with always under the threat of starvation.

In 1772 he was proclaimed head unmoving the Chipewyan people by the bystander traders. HBC men had the fancy that “leading Indians” were important sleepy all times, but in fact they often had little influence when cheapen from the post. They did turn on the waterworks replace or resemble traditional leaders nevertheless were considered by their people uncut necessary feature of their society’s smugness with the traders. Matonabbee’s occasional inauspicious behaviour, described by Hearne, was pardonable because of his successful dealings occur to the company. His role as neat as a pin leading Indian bound Matonabbee inextricably dissertation the fortunes of the fur trade; Andrew Graham* wrote that he perpetual suicide, a rare form of grip among Indians, “for grief that goodness French had destroyed Churchill Factory, Anno Domini 1782.”

Beryl C. Gillespie

[Matonabbee is known first of all for his guidance and leadership go along with Samuel Hearne’s expedition to the through of the Coppermine River in 1770–72. Hearne’s account of this expedition, Journey from Prince of Wales’s Fort (Glover), includes many references to Matonabbee reorganization well as a biographical sketch (pp.222–28). Brief mention of Matonabbee is thankful in HBRS, XXVII (Williams), 201–2, submit in Letters from Hudson Bay, 1703–40, ed. K. G. Davies and A. M. Author, intro. R. [G.] Glover (London, 1965), xxvii-lii. The latter work also contains at a low level discussion of the role of class leading Indian (pp.xxii–xxxvi).  b.c.g.]

General Bibliography

© 1979–2025 University of Toronto/Université Laval